Key result
Continuous glucose monitoring devices are associated with reduced HbA1c levels, enhanced glycemic control, and decreased hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Achieving better long-term glycemic control is the main intervention to reduce macro- and microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus, prompting discussion of the clinical and economic advantages of continuous glucose monitoring devices.
Do continuous glucose monitoring devices improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Do continuous glucose monitoring devices improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Continuous glucose monitoring devices provide significant clinical and economic benefits for patients with T1DM and T2DM by improving glycemic control and reducing costly hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations.
The main intervention to reduce the macro-and microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) remains to achieve better long-term glycemic control. We have discussed the clinical and economic advantages of using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices for type 1 DM and type 2 DM (T1DM and T2DM) based on data from relevant studies in the literature. Our findings show that using these modalities is associated with remarkable outcomes, including reduced HbA1c levels and enhanced glycemic control among patients with T1DM and T2DM. This can enhance the quality of care and life for diabetic patients and intervene against the development of serious complications and hypoglycemia-related adverse events. The cost of routinely using these devices might seem relatively high. However, the estimated cost benefits are usually higher as they can significantly reduce hospitalization rates due to hypoglycemia and the frequency of diabetic therapy malpractices, which are frequently encountered. However, not many studies have reported these outcomes, indicating the need to conduct future relevant studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rahman et al. (2022) conducted a review in Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 and Type 2). Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices vs. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) or usual care was evaluated on Glycemic control (HbA1c levels and time spent in hypoglycemia). Continuous glucose monitoring devices are associated with reduced HbA1c levels, enhanced glycemic control, and decreased hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: