This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The influence of tacticity on chain dimensions, backbone and side-group conformational states and relaxation dynamics, intermolecular hydrogen bonding and its relaxation dynamics was investigated for 30 repeat unit poly(methacrylic acid) (PMA) as a function of the degree-of-neutralisation, f (i.e. charge density) [0 < f < 1 range] in explicit water with Na+ neutralising counter-ions, using molecular dynamics simulations. Chain expansion with increase in charge density is observed. Simulation results, where applicable, compare well with experimental results in the literature. Isotactic (i-PMA) chain exhibits the largest expansion (89% change in Rg), and syndiotactic (s-PMA-RR-0.7) chain shows 31%. For fully neutralised chain (high charge density), the probability for trans conformation at backbone bonds follows the trend i-PMA > a-PMA > s-PMA. At high charge density, a higher probability of trans state is obtained at meso dyads as compared to racemic dyads and the side group in i-PMA relative to other tacticity is conformationally more extended. RR triads impart better hydrogen bonding with water. In the COOH side group, greater rotational mobility is observed for i-PMA as compared to s-PMA. Water coordination to PMA is invariant with tacticity at low f. For f = 1, s-PMA exhibits the best level of H-bonding, due to its 3D chemical structural configuration. Binding distance between water and PMA atoms and their coordination number remain unchanged with respect to ionisation of COOH groups. Isotactic (i-PMA) exhibits the fastest relaxation of polymer-water H-bonds. While counter-ion coordination on to PMA is unaffected by tacticity, the intensity of ion condensation as well as hydrogen bond relaxation time at f = 1 varies in the order i-PMA > a-PMA > s-PMA.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: