Key result
Coronary sinus Reducer implantation linked to a ~1.3 point reduction in mean CCS score.
Why the study?
Does coronary sinus Reducer implantation improve angina severity in patients with severe refractory angina?
Does coronary sinus Reducer implantation improve angina severity in patients with severe refractory angina?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 3.3%
p-value: p=<0.01
Coronary sinus Reducer implantation appears safe and significantly improves angina class in patients with refractory angina, pending confirmation from randomized sham-controlled trials.
Hypothesis-generating for coronary sinus reducer in refractory angina; prospective randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
AIMS: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the coronary sinus (CS) Reducer in attenuating angina severity in patients suffering from severe refractory angina. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with refractory angina, objective evidence of myocardial ischaemia and no option for revascularisation were treated with CS Reducer implantation at two medical centres. Six-month follow-up evaluation consisted of clinical assessment of angina severity. Objective assessment of ischaemia at six-month follow-up was performed in one of the two centres. Successful CS Reducer implantation was achieved in 21 of 23 eligible patients, at both centres. No device-related adverse effects were observed during the procedure or the follow-up period. Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score diminished from a mean of 3.3 at baseline to 2.0 at six months (n=20, p<0.01), exercise duration was prolonged from 3:16 to 5:16 min (min:sec; n=8, p=0.05). Thallium SPECT summed stress score and summed difference score were both reduced (n=9, 21.5±10 vs.13.2±9, p=0.01, and 11.1±6 vs. 4.7±4, p=0.007, respectively). Wall motion score index at peak dobutamine infusion was also significantly improved (n=8, 1.9±0.4 vs. 1.4±0.4, p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: CS Reducer implantation was safe and resulted in significant improvement of angina class. The results of the ongoing randomised sham-control trial will address the concern regarding the possible placebo effect, and hopefully further support our encouraging observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Konigstein et al. (2014) studied severe refractory angina (n=23). Coronary sinus (CS) Reducer vs. Baseline was evaluated on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) score (p=<0.01). Coronary sinus Reducer implantation significantly improved angina severity, reducing the mean Canadian Cardiovascular Society score from 3.3 at baseline to 2.0 at 6 months (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: