A summary report of a three-year study of superconductive energy storage for large utility systems is presented. The preferred conceptual design choices include: large, thin-walled solenoids, 1. 8 K cooling, TiNb in aluminum composite conductors at 5 tesla, bedrock structural support for both axial and radial forces, and a three-phase Graetz (ac/dc) bridge converter interface to the power grid. Preliminary estimates show that capital costs are given by $/kW = 40 + 125 (P/1000)-1/3(t/2)2/3Where P is the average power in MW and t is the discharge (peaking) time in hours. A typical operating loss is 10 ∼ 15% of the stored energy. The concept is technically feasible requiring only present day technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boom et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: