Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study demonstrates light-triggered anti-VEGF release reduces angiogenic activity in retinal cell models, indicating potential for on-demand macular degeneration therapy.
Anti-VEGF injections are effective for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) but require frequent intravitreal dosing and provide limited spatiotemporal control. We engineered injectable chitosan-methacrylate (ChiMA) microgels that co-localize upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) with a photocaged anti-VEGF peptide to enable on-demand, near-infrared (980 nm)–triggered release. Colloidal UCNPs (β-NaYF₄: Yb,Tm core/shell) were synthesized via a thermal decomposition method and subsequently embedded into visible-light–crosslinked ChiMA microgels together with a nitrobenzyl-linked anti-VEGF peptide. We quantified microgel morphology, swelling and injectability, peptide loading/release under near infra-red (NIR) irradiation (20 mW cm -2 ) and durations (30 min), and cytocompatibility in MIO-M1, RPE-1, and HUVEC cells. Anti-angiogenic activity was assessed by VEGF-driven scratch migration, tube formation, and signaling (HIF-1α, p-Akt, p-p38, occludin, ZO-1). Microgels with 10 wt% UCNPs showed the most efficient NIR-triggered release around 85%. Cytocompatibility assays indicated approximately 90% viability for UCNPs-loaded microgels, consistent with minimal cytotoxicity. In vitro , NIR irradiation of anti-VEGF–peptide-functionalized ChiMA microgels reduced endothelial migration and tube formation by 20% and 15%, respectively, relative to VEGF-stimulated controls. VEGF-responsive signaling was concomitantly decreased by 50%, and Akt phosphorylation was likewise halved compared to VEGF alone. These findings indicate that UCNPs-loaded ChiMA microgels enable non-invasive, repeatable, on-demand peptide delivery and attenuate pro-angiogenic pathways, supporting subsequent in vivo evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canbulat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: