This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Total scattering and pair distribution function (PDF) analysis has created new insights that traditional powder diffraction methods have been unable to achieve in understanding the local structures of materials exhibiting disorder or complex nanostructures. Care must be taken in such analyses as subtle and discrete features in the PDF can easily be artefacts generated in the measurement process, which can result in unphysical models and interpretation. The focus of this study is an artefact called the parallax effect, which can occur in area detectors with thick detection layers during the collection of X-ray PDF data. This effect results in high-Qpeak offsets, which subsequently cause anr-dependent shift in the PDF peak positions in real space. Such effects should be accounted for if a truly accurate model is to be achieved, and a simple correction that can be conducted via a Rietveld refinement against the reference data is proposed.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marlton et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: