Key result
ASA plus ticagrelor shows similar 1-month morbidity versus ASA plus clopidogrel after unruptured aneurysm embolization.
Why the study?
Clopidogrel resistance frequently occurs during flow diversion or disruption for complex aneurysms and can cause thromboembolic events, making ticagrelor an alternative that does not require platelet inhibition testing.
Does ASA plus ticagrelor reduce morbidity and mortality compared to ASA plus clopidogrel in patients undergoing unruptured intracranial aneurysm embolization?
Cohort (n=80)
Does ASA plus ticagrelor reduce morbidity and mortality compared to ASA plus clopidogrel in patients undergoing unruptured intracranial aneurysm embolization?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.5% vs 10%
p-value: p=0.36
Ticagrelor appears to be a safe and effective alternative to clopidogrel as part of dual antiplatelet therapy for unruptured intracranial aneurysm embolization.
Ticagrelor may serve as alternative to clopidogrel for dual therapy in aneurysm embolization; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
PURPOSE: Standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for complex aneurysms treated with flow diversion and flow disruption is acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus clopidogrel. However, clopidogrel resistance frequently occurs and can lead to thromboembolic events. Ticagrelor is an alternative not requiring platelet inhibition testing. We compared two DAPT regimens (ASA with clopidogrel or ticagrelor) on morbi-mortality, safety and efficacy of unruptured aneurysm embolization with flow diverter/disrupter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a 1:1 matched cohort compares patients treated with ASA + clopidogrel (March 2013-December 2015) vs. ASA + ticagrelor (January 2016-March 2017). No platelet inhibition testing was conducted. Patients matched for age (±10 years), type of treatment and aneurysm sac size ( ± 2 mm). Primary outcome measures were morbidity and mortality at 1-month; secondary outcomes were thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications [on angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] and groin complications. Outcomes were compared using bivariate analyses. RESULTS: Ninety patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, of which 80 remained after matching (40 per group). There was no statistical difference in 1-month morbidity between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (2.5% vs. 10%, P = 0.36) and no deaths reported. We observed no significant differences between ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups in terms of angiographic thromboembolic complications (5% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.43), territorial infarction on DWI (2.5% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.61), angiographic (0% vs. 0%, P = 1) and MRI (5% vs 5%, P = 1) hemorrhagic complications, new microbleeds (57.5% vs. 40%, P = 0.12) and groin puncture complications (2.5% vs. 0%, P = 1). At three months, there was no delayed territorial infarction or hemorrhage in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor is safe and effective in replacing clopidogrel as DAPT for unruptured aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soize et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Unruptured intracranial aneurysm (n=80). ASA plus ticagrelor vs. ASA plus clopidogrel was evaluated on Morbidity and mortality at 1-month (p=0.36). ASA plus ticagrelor was associated with similar 1-month morbidity compared to ASA plus clopidogrel (2.5% vs. 10%, P=0.36) in patients undergoing unruptured aneurysm embolization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: