Objections are presented to a recent explanation by Hey and Griem of the discrepancy between measured and calculated values for the center of H_α. Their suggestion that the upper-lower state interference term occurring in the theoretical treatments would be reduced by an accurate consideration of Debye shielding is shown to be unjustified. It is further shown that if the model forming the basis of their arguments is adequately amended and correctly exploited, the well-known results of the unified and impact theories are recovered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. Voslamber (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: