The mitigating effects of fish passes to aid fish dispersal are well recognised; however, non‐sports fish species, juveniles and weak swimmers have mostly been neglected when developing solutions to fish passage issues. We studied the juvenile (fork length, FL <60 mm) swimming ability of a weakly swimming fish species, īnanga ( Galaxias maculatus ), up an artificial ramp to evaluate the effects of fish size, ramp slope (5°, 15°, 25°), water velocity and the potential need for resting opportunities (pools) for a successful ascent. Water velocity significantly increased and fish passage success significantly decreased with ramp angle, with only one fish passing the 25° ramp. On average, fish had to be 10 mm larger to ascend a 15° ramp angle than at 5°. Pools did not enhance passage success in this study. To facilitate fish passage at barriers for weakly swimming fish species like juvenile īnanga, ramps should provide a rough surface substrate and have an optimal angle of 5° for a 3‐m ramp.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doehring et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: