Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fifteen patients with intradural spinal lesions were examined with an optimized dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion sequence at 1.5T and 3T. SNR and mean contrast-to-noise ratio were better on 3T compared with 1.5T (P ≤ .05). The goodness of fit of the Tofts and Tofts extended pharmacokinetic models was similar between 1.5T and 3T. Thus, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion of intradural spinal canal lesions is technically feasible at 1.5T and 3T, with better image quality at 3T.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cuvinciuc et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: