Key result
Preoperative levosimendan without an initial bolus is recommended for cardiac surgery patients with severe ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension to reduce complications.
Why the study?
Does preoperative levosimendan reduce complications in cardiac surgery patients with ventricular dysfunction?
Does preoperative levosimendan reduce complications in cardiac surgery patients with ventricular dysfunction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preoperative levosimendan, administered without an initial bolus, is recommended for organoprotection in cardiac surgery patients with severe ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension.
Preoperative use of levosimendan in cardiac surgery patients is one of the most attractive therapeutic alternatives in subjects with left or right ventricular dysfunction. Our review explores the pharmacological bases and clinical evidence for the use of levosimendan, with the intention of making a series of recommendations regarding its use in preoperative optimization prior to cardiac surgery. We carried out a survey of 102 Spanish anesthesiologists in order to shed light on the grey areas regarding the use of this drug prior to surgery. Our findings suggest that levosimendan is recommended for patients with severe left or right ventricular dysfunction, moderate left ventricular dysfunction in which Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation (IABC) is necessary and severe pulmonary hypertension. Administration of levosimendan prior to surgical cardiac intervention without an initial bolus reduces the likelihood of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guerrero et al. (2014) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery patients with left or right ventricular dysfunction (n=102). Preoperative levosimendan was evaluated. Preoperative levosimendan without an initial bolus is recommended for cardiac surgery patients with severe ventricular dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension to reduce complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: