Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the ethical and legal necessity of respecting patient autonomy and obtaining consent, even when interventions are lifesaving.
Intravenous substance abuse is often associated with physical and psychological harm, and often requires urgent medical attention. We report a case of a young male who presented with life-threatening complications of intravenous drug abuse, but refused to give details or agree to the proposed treatment, raising concerns for the team of doctors. A compos mentis patient has a right to decide what should be done to his body. Medical management or surgical interventions cannot be initiated without the patient's consent even if these are lifesaving procedures, or a procedure meant to benefit the patient. Medical practitioner can be liable for assault (criminal law), medical negligence (law of tort), damages (civil action) and even human rights issues may be raised if a patient's autonomy is not respected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atreya et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Intravenous drug abuse with life-threatening complications (n=1). Medical and surgical interventions (refused) was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: