Key result
Male sex is not linked to increased surgical site infection risk after abdominal surgery.
Why the study?
Male sex is controversially discussed as a risk factor for surgical site infections, prompting evaluation of the impact of sex on SSI in abdominal surgery after eliminating confounders.
Does male sex increase the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Cohort (n=6,603)
Yes
Does male sex increase the risk of surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Odds Ratio: 1.1 (95% CI 0.8–1.4)
p-value: p=0.290
After adjusting for relevant confounders such as BMI, duration of surgery, and comorbidities, male sex is not an independent risk factor for surgical site infections following abdominal surgery.
No association between male sex and SSI risk after abdominal surgery; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Objective Male sex is controversially discussed as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of sex on SSI in abdominal surgery under elimination of relevant confounders. Methods Clinicopathological data of 6603 patients undergoing abdominal surgery from a multi-center prospective database of four Swiss hospitals including patients between 2015 and 2018 were assessed. Patients were stratified according to postoperative SSI and risk factors for SSI were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results In 649 of 6603 patients SSI was reported (9.8%). SSI was significantly associated with reoperation (22.7% vs. 3.4%, p <0.001), higher mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.9%, p <0.001) and higher rate of length of hospital stay over the 75 th percentile (57.0 % vs. 17.9 %, p <0.001). In univariate analysis male sex was a significant risk factor for SSI (p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis including multiple confounders ‘ such as comorbidities and perioperative factors there was no association between male sex and risk of SSI (odds ratio (OR) 1.1 [CI 0.8 – 1.4]). Independent risk factors for SSI in multivariate analysis were BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 (OR 1.8 [CI 1.3 - 2.3]), duration of surgery > 75 th percentile (OR 2.3 [1.8 - 2.9]), high contamination level (OR 1.3 [1.0 – 1.6]), laparotomy (OR 1.3 [1.0 – 1.7]), pervious laparotomy (OR 1.4 [1.1 – 1.7]), blood transfusion (OR 1.7 [1.2 – 2.4]), cancer (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.8], malnutrition (OR 2.5 [1.8 – 3.4]). Conclusion Under elimination of relevant confounders there is no significant correlation between sex and risk of SSI after abdominal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zwicky et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Abdominal surgery (n=6,603). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Surgical site infection (SSI) within 30 days after surgery (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.4, p=0.290). After adjusting for relevant confounders, male sex was not significantly associated with an increased risk of surgical site infections following abdominal surgery (OR 1.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: