Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Treatment of [Ru(CO) 3 (η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 1 ) with Me 3 NO in THF (tetrahydrofuran) affords [Ru(CO) 2 (NMe 3 )(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 3b ), while the salt [NEt 4 ][RuI(CO) 2 (η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 2 ) reacts with NCMe in the presence of AgBF 4 to give [Ru(CO) 2 (NCMe)(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 3c ). Related complexes [Ru(CO) 2 (L)(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] (L = CNBu t ( 3d ), PPh 3 ( 3e )) are obtained by displacement of THF from [Ru(CO) 2 (THF)(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 3a ) with CNBu t and PPh 3, respectively. Alkenes and 3a afford the complexes [Ru(CO) 2 (alkene)(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] (alkene = C 2 H 4 ( 4a ), MeCH CH 2 ( 4b ), Me 3 SiCH CH 2 ( 4c ), and C 7 H 10 (norbornene) ( 4d )), whereas alkynes RC⋮CR (R = Me, Ph) give the species [Ru(CO) 2 (RC⋮CR)(η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] (R = Me ( 5a ), Ph ( 5b )). The reaction of complex 5a with K[BH(CHMeEt) 3 ], in Et 2 O solution, followed by addition of 18-crown-6, gives the salt [K(18-crown-6)][Ru{C(Me) C(H)Me}(CO) 2 (η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 6 ), while PPh 3 in CH 2 Cl 2 affords the ylide complex [Ru{C(Me) C(Me)PPh 3 }(CO) 2 (η 5 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 11 )] ( 7 ). Reactions between 3a and the alkynes RC⋮CH (R = Bu t, SiMe 3 ) yield a variety of products, in all of which the carborane ligand adopts a nonspectator role. Complex 3a and 1 mol equiv of Bu t C⋮CH gives a mixture of isomers [Ru(CO) 2 (η 2:η 5 -9-C(H) C(H)Bu t -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 10 )] ( 8a ) and [Ru(CO) 2 (η 2:η 5 -10-C(H) C(H)Bu t -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 10 )] ( 8b ). An X-ray diffraction study on 8a revealed that the ruthenium atom is η 5 -coordinated by the open CCBBB face of the nido -C 2 B 9 cage and by the C C bond of the BCH C(H)Bu t group. The reaction between 3a and 1 mol equiv of Me 3 SiC⋮CH is more complex due to SiMe 3 group cleavage. Isomeric mixtures of [Ru(CO) 2 (η 2:η 5 -9-C(H) C(H)R-7,8-C 2 B 9 H 10 )] (R = H ( 9a ), SiMe 3 ( 10a) ) and [Ru(CO) 2 (η 2:η 5 -10-C(H) C(H)R-7,8-C 2 B 9 H 10 )] (R = H ( 9b ), SiMe 3 ( 10b )) are obtained. Addition of PMe 2 Ph in heptane to 9b gives [Ru(CO) 2 (σ,η 5 -10-C(H)(PMe 2 Ph)CH 2 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 10 )] ( 11b ), the ylide structure of which was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. The Ru(CO) 2 fragment is linked to the nido- C 2 B 9 cage system by η 5 bonding to the CCBBB face and by a Ru−CH 2 σ-bond to the CH 2 C(H)(PMe 2 Ph)B fragment. Reactions between 3a and RC⋮CH, employing an excess of the latter, give the compounds [Ru(CO) 2 {η 2:η 5 -9-C(H) C(H)R-10,11-[C(H) C(H)R] 2 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 8 }] (R = Bu t ( 12a ), SiMe 3 ( 12b )) in which all boron atoms in the open CCBBB face of the cage bonded to the ruthenium carry C(H) C(H)R substituents. Treatment of the complexes 12 with PMe 3 yields respectively [Ru(CO) 2 (PMe 3 ){η 5 -9,10,11-[C(H) C(H)Bu t ] 3 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 8 }] ( 13 ) and [Ru(CO) 2 {σ,η 5 -9-C(H)(PMe 3 )C(H)SiMe 3 -10,11-[C(H) C(H)SiMe 3 ] 2 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 8 }] ( 14 ). The structure of 13 was established by X-ray diffraction. The Ru atom is coordinated by a PMe 3 molecule and the two CO groups and by the nido -9,10,11-[C(H) C(H)Bu t ] 3 -7,8-C 2 B 9 H 8 cage. All boron atoms in the pentagonal CCBBB ring ligating the metal carry C(H) C(H)Bu t substituents. In addition to X-ray crystal structure determinations, NMR data for the new complexes are reported and discussed in relation to their structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: