Key result
Surgical repair of post-infarction LV pseudoaneurysm is linked to 100% survival versus conservative treatment.
Why the study?
Post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm carries a substantial risk of sudden rupture, prompting a comparison of surgical results with conservative treatment.
Does surgical repair improve survival in patients with post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm compared to conservative treatment?
Cohort (n=17)
No
Does surgical repair improve survival in patients with post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm compared to conservative treatment?
Surgical repair of post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm is associated with significantly better survival compared to conservative management, which carries a high risk of sudden cardiac death.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports surgical repair for post-infarction LV pseudoaneurysm; leaves open optimal strategy without randomized confirmation.
Background Post-infarction left ventricular (LV) pseudoaneurysm is a rare mechanical complication of myocardial infarction that carries a substantial risk of sudden rupture. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical results of post-infarction LV pseudoaneurysm with those of conservative treatment. Methods From 2016 to 2021, 22 patients were hospitalized for LV pseudoaneurysm, including 17 cases (77.3%) caused by myocardial infarction. Of the 17 patients, 10 (58.8%) underwent surgical repair, while seven (41.2%) were treated medically. The clinical course, echocardiograph data, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. Survival rates of the surgical and conservative groups were compared. Results There were no perioperative deaths. Intra-aortic balloon pumping support was required in two (20%) patients. No follow-up mortality was observed in the surgical group and at the last follow-up, all the patients were classified as New York Heart Association class I–II. In the conservative group, there was one (14.3%) hospital death and two (28.6%) additional deaths during follow-up. A significant difference was found in survival between the two groups ( P = 0.024). Conclusions Surgical repair of post-infarction LV pseudoaneurysm can be performed with good results, while conservative treatment carries a significant risk of sudden death. Surgical repair is indicated for every patient diagnosed, even those with a small pseudoaneurysm without symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm (n=17). Surgical repair vs. Conservative treatment was evaluated on Overall survival (p=0.024). Surgical repair of post-infarction left ventricular pseudoaneurysm resulted in 100% survival, whereas conservative treatment was associated with a 42.9% mortality rate (P=0.024).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: