Key result
iCare Health Monitor app shows ~0.96 correlation with manual SBP in stroke survivors.
Why the study?
Frequent and accurate blood pressure monitoring is vital in stroke management, necessitating simple, portable, and accurate devices.
Does the iCare Health Monitor smartphone application accurately and reliably measure blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate compared to standardized methods in stroke survivors?
Cross-Sectional (n=86)
Yes
Does the iCare Health Monitor smartphone application accurately and reliably measure blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate compared to standardized methods in stroke survivors?
The iCare Health Monitor smartphone application is a valid and reliable tool for assessing blood pressure and heart rate, but not respiratory rate, among stroke survivors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports smartphone SBP monitoring evaluation in stroke survivors; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Frequent and accurate monitoring of blood pressure (BP) is a vital part of stroke management. There is therefore the need for availability of simple, portable and accurate devices for monitoring BP at any point in time. Objective To determine the validity and reliability of the iCare Health Monitor (iCHM) smartphone application in the measurement of BP, heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) amongst stroke survivors in Anambra State. Methods This was a cross-sectional survey involving 86 stroke survivors (64.0% males; mean age = 65.23 ± 12.10 years) consecutively recruited from three conveniently selected centres in Anambra State. BP, PR and RR were assessed using both the standardised methods and iCHM. The parameters were reassessed with the iCHM after few minutes. Convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the iCHM were determined using Pearson product moment correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient respectively at an alpha level of 0.05. Results The convergent validity of the iCHM was excellent in measuring systolic BP (SBP) ( r = 0.96; p < 0.01), diastolic BP (DBP) ( r = 0.93; p < 0.01), HR ( r = 0.96; p < 0.01) but moderate in measuring RR ( r = 0.74; p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability of the iCHM was excellent in assessing SBP (ICC = 0.95; p < 0.01), DBP (ICC = 0.94; p < 0.01) and HR (ICC = 0.92; p < 0.01) but poor in assessing RR (ICC = 0.35; p = 0.03). Also, the iCHM displayed clinically insignificant bias. Conclusion The iCHM is a valid and reliable tool for assessing BP and HR (but not RR) among stroke survivors. Its use is therefore recommended especially in poor-resource countries where gadgets for assessing BP and PR might not easily be affordable and available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okoye et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke (n=86). iCare Health Monitor smartphone application vs. Standardized manual methods was evaluated on Convergent validity of systolic blood pressure measurement (r = 0.96, p=<0.01). The iCare Health Monitor smartphone application demonstrated excellent convergent validity (r = 0.96) for measuring systolic blood pressure compared to standard manual methods in stroke survivors.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: