Key result
CITED4 gene transfer after reperfusion reduces scar size and improves cardiac function in mice.
Why the study?
Transgenic CITED4 overexpression protects against adverse remodeling after ischemia/reperfusion injury, but whether somatic gene transfer in a clinically relevant time frame promotes recovery was unknown.
Does cardiac CITED4 gene delivery via intravenous AAV9 injections improve cardiac function and reduce scar size in wild type mice after ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Does cardiac CITED4 gene delivery via intravenous AAV9 injections improve cardiac function and reduce scar size in wild type mice after ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Somatic gene transfer of CITED4 delivered in a clinically relevant time frame mitigates adverse ventricular remodeling and improves cardiac function after ischemic injury in a mouse model.
Should not alter post-MI care; leaves open translation of AAV9-CITED4 therapy to larger models and humans.
Cardiac signaling pathways functionally important in the heart's response to exercise often protect the heart against pathological stress, potentially providing novel therapeutic targets. However, it is important to determine which of these pathways can be feasibly targeted in vivo. Transgenic overexpression of exercise-induced CITED4 has been shown to protect against adverse remodeling after ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI). Here we investigated whether somatic gene transfer of CITED4 in a clinically relevant time frame could promote recovery after IRI. Cardiac CITED4 gene delivery via intravenous AAV9 injections in wild type mice led to an approximately 3-fold increase in cardiac CITED4 expression. After 4 weeks, CITED4-treated animals developed physiological cardiac hypertrophy without adverse remodeling. In IRI, delivery of AAV9-CITED4 after reperfusion resulted in a 6-fold increase in CITED4 expression 1 week after surgery, as well as decreased apoptosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory markers, culminating in a smaller scar and improved cardiac function 8 weeks after IRI, compared with control mice receiving AAV9-GFP. Somatic gene transfer of CITED4 induced a phenotype suggestive of physiological cardiac growth and mitigated adverse remodeling after ischemic injury. These studies support the feasibility of CITED4 gene therapy delivered in a clinically relevant time frame to mitigate adverse ventricular remodeling after ischemic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lerchenmüller et al. (2024) studied Ischemia/reperfusion injury. CITED4 gene delivery via intravenous AAV9 injections vs. AAV9-GFP was evaluated on Cardiac function, scar size, apoptosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory markers. Somatic gene transfer of CITED4 via AAV9 after reperfusion decreased apoptosis, fibrosis, and inflammatory markers, resulting in a smaller scar and improved cardiac function at 8 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: