Key result
Apixaban matches other DOACs for stroke risk but reduces major bleeding versus rivaroxaban and dabigatran.
Why the study?
Do different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) differ in efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Population
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (based on 22 included network meta-analyses)
Comparison
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs Other DOACs
Design
Systematic_review
Authors
Loading...
Apixaban may be preferred for lower major bleeding risk without efficacy loss in nonvalvular AF; reinforces network meta-analysis consensus on DOAC safety.
Systematic Review
Do different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) differ in efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
This systematic review of network meta-analyses suggests that while DOACs have similar efficacy for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to rivaroxaban and dabigatran 150 mg.
Cohen et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Apixaban vs. Other DOACs (rivaroxaban, dabigatran 150 mg) was evaluated on Stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding. Apixaban showed no significant difference in stroke or systemic embolism compared with other DOACs, but had a lower risk of major bleeding than rivaroxaban and dabigatran 150 mg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: