Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Materials study demonstrates flexible near-white electroluminescent devices using a screen-printable dielectric ink, indicating robust mechanical durability and high luminous efficacy for flexible...
Flexible alternating-current electroluminescent (ACEL) devices are promising for patterned and mechanically compliant lighting, but integrating optical transparency, dielectric performance, and near-white emission within a simple printed structure remains challenging. Here, a screen-printable and UV-curable transparent dielectric ink based on polyurethane acrylate, 4-acryloylmorpholine, and propylene carbonate (PC) was developed for flexible ACEL devices containing a single phosphor-composite emissive layer. Among the investigated formulations, 30 wt % PC provided the best overall balance of printability, wettability, optical transmission, dielectric response, dielectric loss, and electroluminescent output, and this selection was further supported by quantitative multi-criteria analysis. The printed dielectric layer exhibited an ITO-PET-referenced transmittance above 90% over 400–700 nm and a relative permittivity of approximately 25 at 1 kHz. Dielectric-film specimens with an average thickness of 50.0 ± 1.6 μm showed a breakdown strength of 24.52 ± 0.40 MV m−1. A single printed emissive layer containing ZnS:Cu and CaAlSiN3:Eu2+ at a mass ratio of 3:1 exhibited near-white chromaticity. The optimized devices exhibited average CIE coordinates of (0.331 ± 0.002, 0.331 ± 0.002), a correlated color temperature of 5457 ± 71 K, a moderate color rendering index of 69 ± 1, and a luminance of 48.7 ± 1.0 cd m−2 at 120 V and 500 Hz. Integrating-sphere measurements further yielded a luminous efficacy of 10.4 ± 0.3 lm W−1 under the same driving conditions. After 1000 bending cycles at a radius of 5 mm, the devices retained approximately 77% of their initial luminance, showing that electroluminescent functionality was maintained under repeated bending.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: