Key result
Sievers type 0 is linked to ~29% higher fibrotic density than type 1 in severe bicuspid AS.
Why the study?
Whether Sievers morphology influences tissue composition in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and whether these differences are sex-specific remained unclear.
Does Sievers type 0 morphology compared to type 1 influence fibrotic and calcific remodeling in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis?
Observational (n=244)
Does Sievers type 0 morphology compared to type 1 influence fibrotic and calcific remodeling in patients with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis?
In severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, Sievers type 0 morphology is associated with higher fibrotic density compared to type 1, with exploratory analyses suggesting this difference may be more prominent in women.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform future risk stratification in bicuspid stenosis; hypothesis-generating without prospective outcome data.
Aims Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), characterized by progressive fibro-calcific remodeling of the valve leaflets, but whether Sievers morphology (type 0 vs. type 1) influences tissue composition and whether these differences are sex-specific remain unclear. This study aimed to compare calcific and fibrotic remodeling between Sievers type 0 and type 1 BAV in severe AS, and to explore the effect modified by sex. Methods and results This retrospective study included 244 patients with severe BAV stenosis (type 0: n=134, type 1: n=110; 43.4% women) who underwent both echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography. Calcific and fibrotic volumes were quantified and indexed to aortic annulus area to achieve density parameters. In the overall cohort, fibrotic density was significantly higher in type 0 versus type 1 (456.5 vs. 354.3 mm3/cm2, p<0.001), whereas calcific density did not differ between groups. In exploratory sex-stratified analyses, the difference in fibrotic density between type 0 and type 1 was statistically significant in women (463.9 vs. 376.5 mm3/cm2, p=0.011) but not in men. Multivariable regression confirmed these associations in women (β=-2.2, 95% CI: -4.0 – -0.4, p=0.016), while no significant associations were observed in men. However, formal interaction testing between Sievers type and sex was not significant (p=0.140). Conclusion In severe BAV stenosis, Sievers type 0 morphology is associated with higher fibrotic density than type 1, whereas calcific density is comparable, exploratory analyses suggest a potential sex-related difference that warrants further investigation in larger cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis (n=244). Sievers type 0 morphology vs. Sievers type 1 morphology was evaluated on fibrotic density (p=<0.001). In severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, Sievers type 0 morphology was associated with significantly higher fibrotic density compared to type 1 (456.5 vs. 354.3 mm3/cm2, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: