Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative survey organizes interest-rate modelling into a five-layer pricing architecture across sell-side trading desks, highlighting structural responses to evolving financial market...
Interest‐rate modelling is often taught as a catalogue of competing stochastic equations, obscuring why models were created and why modern sell‐side desks use several simultaneously. This survey reorganises the field around five layers of a pricing architecture: curve construction; arbitrage‐free dynamics; volatility‐smile representation; collateral, multi‐curve and risk‐free‐rate conventions; and numerical implementation. Within this framework, the progression from Vasicek and Cox–Ingersoll–Ross to Hull–White, HJM, the LIBOR market model, SABR and post‐LIBOR forward market models is interpreted as a sequence of responses to new products, quotation practices, computational constraints and market institutions—not as a tournament won by one equation. We derive the core equations, compare the principal model families, connect calibration choices to hedging instruments, and map models to major rates products and XVA applications. Particular attention is paid to risks concealed by exact vanilla calibration, including correlation, conditional curve dynamics, future smile behavior and numerical error. An open Python/C++ companion repository provides reproducible illustrations for selected stages. The resulting framework offers a systematic introduction for new quantitative analysts and a practical reference for researchers, traders, model developers and validators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: