The compounds [Zn(tu)2(μ-fum)] 2 (tu = thiourea, fum = fumarate), [Zn(tu)2(μ-mal)] 3 (mal = malonate), [Zn(tu)2(μ-ipht)]·H2O 4 (ipht = isophthalate), [Zn(tu)2(μ-citr)] 5 (citr = citraconate), [Zn(tu)2(μ-pht)] 6 (pht = phthalate), [Zn(tu)2(μ-male)]·H2O 7 (male = maleate) and [Zn(tu)2(μ-hpht)]28 (hpht = homophthalate) have all been prepared from the reaction of [ZnCl2(tu)4] with the appropriate sodium dicarboxylate. Crystal structure determinations of the seven compounds demonstrate that in 2–7 bridging dicarboxylates link the zinc centres into polymeric chains, whereas in 8 bridging homophthalates lead to discrete dimers. Where permitted by the relative orientations of the carboxylates, the chains are linked together by pairs of N–H⋯O hydrogen bonds between thiourea NH groups and carboxylate oxygen atoms in a hydrogen bond donor–donor acceptor–acceptor (DD∶AA) arrangement. The hydrogen bonding patterns in the structure of 2 are very similar to those previously observed in [NEt4]2[fum]·2tu, suggesting that incorporation of zinc has little effect on the gross structure. The supramolecular structures of 5 and 6 are very similar to each other, and also to that of the previously reported compound [Zn(tu)2(μ-male)], which reflects the similar dispositions of the carboxylate groups. In contrast, the structure of 7 is very different, illustrating the dramatic effects that inclusion of solvent can have on the supramolecular structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burrows et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: