We report and compare the photoelectrochemical properties of ZnO nanowalls and nanowires electro-chemically deposited on an indium-tin-oxide coated glass substrate in an aqueous zinc nitrate elec-trolyte at 70 C with and without post-annealing at 400 C. Post-annealing at 400 C produced a drastic change in the morphology of ZnO nanowalls but not in that of ZnO nanowires. X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies provide detailed characterization of the respective changes in crys-tallinity and composition profile of the as-deposited nanostructures before and after post-annealing. Fur-thermore, the optical band gap is found to be smaller for the post-annealed nanowalls and nanowires. The Mott-Schottky measurements show a negative shift in the flat-band potential for the post-annealed sam-ples. Upon 100 mW/cm2 (AM 1.5) light illumination, the photocurrent density for the as-deposited (post-annealed) nanowalls and nanowires were measured to be 0.54 mA/cm2 (1.56 mA/cm2) and 0.12 mA/cm2 (1.03 mA/cm2), respectively, at an applied potential of 0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl. The significant improve-ment in the photoelectrochemical properties from the post-annealed ZnO nanostructures is believed to be due to increases in crystallinity and oxygen vacancy defects, and to reduction in the band gap with the corresponding increase in light absorption at higher wavelength. This study suggests that further improve-ment lies in synthesizing mesoporous and/or hydrid ZnO nanostructures with semiconductor materials with a smaller band gap. ∗Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pradhan et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: