Key result
High cardiovascular risk score and CAC >3 linked to ~660% higher MACE risk versus low scores.
Why the study?
Patients with COPD are at high risk of MACEs, but existing clinical risk-stratification tools have underperformed in predicting outcomes.
Does a combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) improve risk assessment of MACEs in patients with COPD?
Cohort (n=529)
Does a combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) improve risk assessment of MACEs in patients with COPD?
Combining cardiovascular risk scores with coronary artery calcium scores significantly improves the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with COPD.
Combined high scores flag elevated MACE risk; hypothesis-generating for refined stratification, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD are at high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) developing. Existing clinical tools for risk stratification in these patients have underperformed in predicting the outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a combination of cardiovascular risk score (CVRS) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) improve risk assessment of MACEs in patients with COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational cohort of patients with COPD (n = 529). They underwent a chest CT scan, and clinical, functional, and laboratory data were recorded. The CACS and CVRS (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE] 2, SCORE2-Older People [OP], SCORE2-Diabetes, and Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease [SMART] risk scores) were calculated. Using a threshold of CVRS of ≥ 10% or CACS score of > 3, patients were divided into 4 groups-group I, CVRS < 10% and CACS ≤ 3; group II, CVRS ≥ 10% and CACS ≤ 3; group III, CVRS < 10% and CACS > 3; and group IV, CVRS ≥ 10% and CACS > 3-who were followed up for a median of 98 months. Regression analysis and Kaplan Meier curves were used to compare the risks among groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the performance of CACS and CVRS and their combination to predict MACEs. RESULTS: Most patients were male (80%) with moderate COPD. Over time, 131 patients (24%) experienced a MACE. Compared with group I, the hazard ratios for MACEs were: group IV, 7.6 (95% CI, 4.9-11.9; P < .001); group III, 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8-8.5; P < .001); and group II, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P < .001). The areas under the ROC curve for predicting MACEs were 0.72 (P < .01) for CACS plus CVRS compared with 0.69 for CVRS and 0.66 for CACS. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cardiovascular risk and coronary artery calcification scores were shown to provide a complementary role in MACE risk stratification in patients with COPD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
de‐Torres et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in COPD (n=529). High cardiovascular risk score (CVRS ≥ 10%) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS > 3) vs. Low cardiovascular risk score (CVRS < 10%) and coronary artery calcium score (CACS ≤ 3) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 7.6, 95% CI 4.9-11.9, p=< .001). High cardiovascular risk score (≥10%) combined with coronary artery calcium score (>3) significantly increased the risk of MACEs compared to low scores (HR 7.6; 95% CI 4.9-11.9; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: