Nine of the title compounds were synthesized, and their solvolysis rates were determined in 80%(v/v) aq acetone at 45 °C. The effects of the pi-donor substituents for each substituent position are shown to be excellently described in terms of inductive(I) and pi-electronic(Pi) effects by means of the LSFE equation (logk⁄k0=ρiσi+ρπ+σπ+), Just as with those in the 1-naphthyl systems. When those data are joined with all our substituent effects data for the phenyl, 4-biphenylyl, 2-fluorenyl, and 1-naphthyl systems under identical conditions, it is clear that the overall correspondence between the ρi values and Dewar’s simple-field-effect function (1⁄r) is satisfactory. On the other hand, the ρπ+ values appear to give slightly different responses (separate correlations for the 1- and 2-naphthyl systems) to the SCF-π charge difference values; this may be ascribed to the steric effects on the Pi effect in only the 1-naphthyl-solvolysis sets. Furthermore, the position constancy of the I effect (ρi,6−X−2⁄ρi,7−X−2=0.85) has been observed in the present solvolysis and the available data for dissociation of 2-naphthalenecarboxylic acids involving relatively weak Pi effects; the figure is in good agreement with the ratio of ρi,para⁄ρi,meta=0.85. Analogous results were also achieved by the same treatment to 2-benzo[b]thienyl reactivities. All the results are discussed with respect to the validity of the LSFE equation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuno et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: