Key result
Isometric Exercise Scale correlates strongly with Borg CR-10 for rating perceived exertion during isometric exercise.
Why the study?
Methods of prescribing and controlling isometric exercise intensity often require expensive equipment and specialist knowledge, whereas ratings of perceived exertion may provide a more accessible alternative.
Is the Isometric Exercise Scale (IES) a valid and reliable measure of perceived exertion compared to the Borg CR-10 scale during continuous incremental isometric exercise in healthy males?
Cross-Sectional (n=29)
Randomized for scale presentation order
No
Is the Isometric Exercise Scale (IES) a valid and reliable measure of perceived exertion compared to the Borg CR-10 scale during continuous incremental isometric exercise in healthy males?
Effect estimate: r = 0.967
p-value: p=<0.001
The Isometric Exercise Scale (IES) is a valid and reliable tool for monitoring perceived exertion and physiological intensity during isometric exercise, offering an accessible alternative to complex equipment.
May support perceived exertion monitoring in isometric protocols; leaves open validation in patients and prospective designs.
Isometric exercise (IE) interventions are an effective non-medical method of reducing arterial blood pressure (BP). Current methods of prescribing and controlling isometric exercise intensity often require the use of expensive equipment and specialist knowledge. However, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) may provide a more accessible means of monitoring exercise intensity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the validity of a specific Isometric Exercise Scale (IES) during a continuous incremental IE test. Twenty-nine male participants completed four incremental isometric wall squat tests. Each test consisted of five 2-min stages of progressively increasing workload. Workload was determined by knee joint angle from 135° to 95°. The tests were continuous with no rest periods between the stages. Throughout the exercise protocol, RPE (IES and Borg's CR-10), heart rate and blood pressure were recorded. A strong positive linear relationship was found between the IES and the CR-10 (r = 0.967). Likewise, strong positive relationships between the IES and wall squat duration (r = 0.849), HR (r = 0.819) and BP (r = 0.841) were seen. Intra-class correlation coefficients and coefficients of variations for the IES ranged from r = 0.81 to 0.91 and 4.5-54%, respectively, with greater reliability seen at the higher workloads. The IES provides valid and reliable measurements of RPE, exercise intensity, and the changes in physiological measures of exertion during continuous incremental IE; as such, the IES can be used as an accessible measure of exercise intensity during IE interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lea et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy normotensive (n=29). Isometric Exercise Scale (IES) vs. Borg CR-10 scale was evaluated on Construct validity (correlation between IES and CR-10 ratings of perceived exertion) (r = 0.967, p=<0.001). The Isometric Exercise Scale demonstrated strong construct validity with the Borg CR-10 scale (r = 0.967) for measuring ratings of perceived exertion during continuous isometric exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: