Key result
Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears is a cost-effective procedure that improves patient-reported outcomes with minimal complications.
Why the study?
Although favorable clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy are well established, its cost-effectiveness has not been as well defined.
Does hip arthroscopy improve patient-reported outcomes and provide cost-effective treatment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
Does hip arthroscopy improve patient-reported outcomes and provide cost-effective treatment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive and cost-effective treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome that improves patient-reported outcomes.
Hip arthroscopy has emerged as a highly popular and minimally invasive treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears by correcting the femoral and acetabular morphology and addressing the chondrolabral pathology. It has been reported to lead to significant improvements of patient-reported outcomes with minimal complications at short-term, mid-term, and long-term follow-up in addition to having low rates of secondary surgeries. As a result, rates of hip arthroscopy have increased dramatically, both in the United States and worldwide. Albeit these favorable outcomes of hip arthroscopy have been well-established, its cost-effectiveness has not yet been as well defined. However, even in the scenario of limited resources of today’s health care, new data has shown that this procedure is truly cost-effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maldonado et al. (2020) conducted a review in Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears. Hip arthroscopy was evaluated. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears is a cost-effective procedure that improves patient-reported outcomes with minimal complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: