BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) is a widely used immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplant patients. In Brazil, around 30% of patients awaiting kidney transplantation carry anti-HCV antibodies. Previous observations suggest altered CsA pharmacokinetics in these patients. METHODS: We conducted two pharmacokinetic studies. In the pre-transplant (pre-Tx) study, we examined 22 dialysis patients on chronic hemodialysis awaiting transplantation, 11 anti-HCV+ [seven polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive] matched against 11 controls. In the post-transplant (post-Tx) study, we enrolled 24 kidney allograft recipients - 10 anti-HCV+ (six PCR-positive), and 14 controls. In the first study, all patients received an 8-mg/kg dose of CsA microemulsion (ME). Secondly, the dosage was indicated by the patient's medical team. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated from 13 blood samples (0-12 h postdose) by fluorescence polarization immunoassay with specific monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: In both studies, maximum concentration (C(max)), minimum concentration (C(min)) and area under the CsA time-concentration curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)) were higher for anti-HCV+ patients than for controls, but significantly so only for AUC(0-12) in the pre-Tx study (42%; p < 0.05). When PCR-positive patients were compared with controls, differences were amplified. In the pre-Tx study, differences were 58%, 69%, and 91% higher in PCR-positive patients for C(max) (p = 0.05), AUC(0-12) (p < 0.01), and C(min) (p < 0.01), respectively. In the post-Tx study, results were 50% (p < 0.01) and 32% (p < 0.01) higher in PCR-positive patients for C(max) and AUC(0-12), respectively. In the pre-Tx study, the impact of viremia was significantly higher in female patients. CsA trough levels remained higher along the first year post-transplantation in viremic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-HCV+ patients, especially those with viremia, present altered CsA pharmacokinetics, with higher peak levels and drug exposure than controls.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wolffenbüttel et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: