Key result
Standardized loop mitral valve repair shows ~84% four-year survival with high freedom from reoperation.
Why the study?
The authors sought to review the midterm results of their approach for mitral valve repair using standardized loops.
Does the standardized loop technique for mitral valve repair provide good midterm clinical outcomes in patients with mitral prolapse?
Observational (n=65)
No
Does the standardized loop technique for mitral valve repair provide good midterm clinical outcomes in patients with mitral prolapse?
The standardized loop technique for mitral valve repair demonstrates favorable midterm survival and freedom from reoperation.
May support standardized loop technique in mitral prolapse repair; leaves open need for randomized comparisons.
BACKGROUND: We reviewed the midterm results of our approach for mitral valve repair with the use of standardized loops. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center study, mitral repairs performed between November 2015 and December 2019 with the standardized loop technique were included. Predefined loops of 15 and 25 mm (Gore-Tex) were implanted for posterior or anterior mitral prolapses, respectively. Isolated or concomitant mitral repairs were performed by either a sternotomy or minithoracotomy. Mean follow-up was 25.3 ± 14.7 months. RESULTS: Among 92 patients operated on for mitral repair during this period, 65 had repair with the standardized loop technique. They were mostly men (73.8%) and the mean age was 65.1 ± 9.7 years. Valve prolapse was mainly posterior (87.7%), and cordal rupture was seen in 81.5% of cases. The procedures were carried out by a minithoracotomy in 49.2% of patients. Isolated mitral repairs represented 63.1% of cases. Crossclamp and bypass times were 102 ± 22.8 min and 144.7 ± 34.9 min, respectively. The mean number of loops implanted was 2.7 ± 0.9. No patient left the operating room with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. Postoperative morbidity was 18.4% (12 patients) and 30-day mortality was 3.1% (2 patients). Overall 4-year survival and freedom from reoperation for mitral repair failure were 84.4% and 91.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The standardized loop technique for mitral repair showed good midterm results. This technique can be valuable in the armamentarium of mitral repairs. Further evaluation is needed for long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hysi et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Mitral valve prolapse requiring repair (n=65). Standardized loop technique was evaluated on Overall 4-year survival. The standardized loop technique for mitral valve repair demonstrated an overall 4-year survival of 84.4% and freedom from reoperation of 91.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: