Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief Few anesthesia studies have explored perioperative continuous epidural infusion of neostigmine. We examined such a regimen in thoracotomy patients. Ninety patients were randomized to one of three groups in this double-blind trial. Before anesthesia induction, an epidural catheter was inserted in all patients at T5-8 levels under local anesthesia. Pre-neo patients received bolus 500-μg epidural neostigmine before anesthesia induction followed by infusion of 125 μg/h until the end of surgery. Post-neo patients received epidural saline during the same time periods plus bolus 500-μg epidural neostigmine at end of surgery. Patients in the control group received saline placebo during all three periods. Patients in the neostigmine groups postoperatively received patient-controlled epidural analgesia with morphine 0.02 mg/mL, bupivacaine 0.08 mg/mL, and neostigmine 7 μg/mL. Control patient-controlled epidural analgesia excluded neostigmine. Data were recorded for 6 postoperative days. Daily patient-controlled epidural analgesia consumption (mL) for Pre-neo patients was significantly less than that of post-neo and control group patients for postoperative days 1–6 (at least 10% and 16% less, respectively; P < 0.05). There was a modest decrease in pain intensity on postoperative days 3–6 for pre-neo patients versus other groups (P < 0.05). These results suggest that continuous thoracic epidural neostigmine started before anesthesia provided preemptive, preventive analgesia and an analgesic-sparing effect that improved postoperative analgesia for these patients without increasing the incidence of adverse effects. IMPLICATIONS: Preoperative use of epidural neostigmine for thoracotomy patients followed by continuous infusion during surgery and extended into the postoperative period (e.g., for 6 days) provided preemptive, preventive analgesia and an analgesic-sparing effect that improved postoperative analgesia without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chia et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: