Key result
Elevated serum periostin identifies childhood asthma with a diagnostic AUC of 0.70.
Why the study?
Does serum periostin accurately diagnose asthma in children compared to conventional biomarkers?
Case-Control (n=55)
Does serum periostin accurately diagnose asthma in children compared to conventional biomarkers?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.70
Absolute Event Rate: 134% vs 112%
p-value: p=0.012
Serum periostin is a viable non-invasive biomarker for diagnosing pediatric asthma, with diagnostic accuracy equivalent to conventional biomarkers.
Serum periostin shows modest diagnostic signal in pediatric asthma; leaves open its utility versus conventional biomarkers pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: There are some biomarkers for asthma diagnosis but they are often difficult in clinical use, particularly in pediatric cases. Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein, upregulated in response to IL-4 or IL-13. Serum periostin is expected to be used as a non-invasive biomarker for asthma diagnosis and management. METHODS: Twenty-eight children with asthma (BA) and 27 children without asthma (patients with pectus excavatum, etc. as control group) aged 6-16 years were included. Bronchial asthma was diagnosed according to International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), lung function, blood eosinophil counts, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and serum periostin levels were assessed. Results were compared between BA and controls. Asthma diagnostic accuracies were calculated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Serum periostin levels in the BA group were significantly higher than those in the control group [medians (with interquartile ranges), 134.0 (116.3-166.3) vs. 112.0 (97.0-132.0) ng/ml; p = 0.012]. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for periostin, FeNO, and eosinophil counts were 0.70, 0.72, and 0.84, respectively. After the exclusion of controls with pectus excavatum, AUC for periostin, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ), and maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (MMF) were 0.75, 0.74, and 0.80, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serum periostin levels were significantly higher in children with asthma. ROC AUC values for periostin were equivalent to conventional biomarkers, including FeNO levels and lung function testing, indicating the utility of serum periostin levels in diagnosing asthma in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inoue et al. (2016) conducted a case-control in Pediatric asthma (n=55). Serum periostin levels vs. Non-asthmatic controls was evaluated on Serum periostin levels (ng/ml) (AUC 0.70, p=0.012). Serum periostin levels were significantly higher in children with asthma compared to controls (median 134.0 vs 112.0 ng/ml; p=0.012), yielding a diagnostic AUC of 0.70.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: