Key result
Cardia perimeter measures larger in reflux esophagitis and smaller in achalasia versus controls.
Why the study?
Does the perimeter of the muscular gastroesophageal junction differ between patients with achalasia, reflux esophagitis, and control subjects?
Observational (n=66)
Does the perimeter of the muscular gastroesophageal junction differ between patients with achalasia, reflux esophagitis, and control subjects?
The perimeter of the muscular gastroesophageal junction varies significantly by disease state, being enlarged in reflux esophagitis and narrowed in achalasia.
Cardia perimeter differences in reflux esophagitis and achalasia should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for junction anatomy and needs prospective validation.
The location and perimeter of the true muscular gastroesophageal junction or cardia were determined during operation in 6 patients with achalasia, in 20 control subjects, and in 40 patients with reflux esophagitis. These two latter groups were submitted to highly selective vagotomy, owing to duodenal ulcer in the control subjects and as part of the surgical technique in reflux esophagitis patients. The careful dissection and isolation of the distal 5-6 cm of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction permitted us to measure the location and perimeter very precisely. There was a very close correlation between the distance incisors-beginning of gastroesophageal sphincter measured preoperatively and the distance incisors-cardia measured during surgery. The cardia could be clearly identified by external inspection corresponding to the limit between the longitudinal muscle layer of the esophagus and the serosal surface of the stomach. The perimeter of the cardia in the patients with reflux esophagitis was significantly larger than the perimeter of the control subjects (p less than 0.001). Intraoperative manometry demonstrated that the external limit of the cardia corresponded to the beginning of the gastroesophageal sphincter. Patients with achalasia had significantly smaller perimeter than controls or reflux esophagitis patients (p less than 0.001).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csendes et al. (1981) conducted an observational in Reflux esophagitis and achalasia (n=66). Reflux esophagitis or achalasia vs. Control subjects (duodenal ulcer) was evaluated on Perimeter of the cardia (p=<0.001). The perimeter of the cardia was significantly larger in patients with reflux esophagitis (p<0.001) and significantly smaller in patients with achalasia (p<0.001) compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: