Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A pegmatite from Diethensdorf, Saxonian Granulite Massif, Germany, contains fine-grained aggregates of at least three different varieties of niobian rutile and a (W, Sc)-rich ferrocolumbite. In addition, rutile 1 occurs as larger grains. Electron microprobe analyses of niobian rutile gave compositions close to the general formula (Fe,Mn) x (Nb,Ta) 2x Ti 3-3x O 6 , with Nb and Fe contents decreasing in the order rutile 1 → rutile 2 → rutile 3 and Ti increasing accordingly. The substitution of (Ti,Sn) by Fe + (Nb,Ta) is 35-32 at% in rutile 1, 28-26 at% in rutile 2, and 24-19 at% in rutile 3. The intergrown ferrocolumbite has Ta/(Nb + Ta) ratios of <0.10 and Mn/(Fe + Mn) ratios <0.25, and shows unusually high contents of Sc 2 O 3 and WO 3 (up to 4.0 and 8.8 wt%, respectively). Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis with Guinier and Bragg-Brentano methods identified at least three rutile phases (herein termed A, B, and C) with cell volumes decreasing with the Nb (+ Ta, W) contents. Nb/Ti ratios of rutiles estimated from Rietveld refinements roughly conform to the results of electron microprobe analysis. The cation distribution in the ferrocolumbite was refined on the basis of a two-scatterer model at sites 8d and 4c in space group Pbcn, leading to ordering of the heavy atoms on site 8d. Textural evidence suggests that the fine-grained intergrowths of ferrocolumbite + rutile 2 + rutile 3 (+ rutile 1) were formed by exsolution from a precursor phase that most probably was not rutile 1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okrusch et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: