Key result
Active tVNS decreases flow experience versus sham in healthy young adults.
Why the study?
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) modulate flow experience in healthy young volunteers?
RCT (n=32)
Single-blind
Randomized cross-over
No
Does transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) modulate flow experience in healthy young volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.97% vs 4.36%
p-value: p=<0.05
Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation decreases flow experience (absorption scores) in healthy volunteers, suggesting a causal role of the vagus nerve and noradrenergic system in modulating flow.
tVNS may impair flow in healthy adults; extends causal evidence for vagal-noradrenergic modulation of psychological flow.
Flow has been defined as a pleasant psychological state that people experience when completely absorbed in an activity. Previous correlative evidence showed that the vagal tone (as indexed by heart rate variability) is a reliable marker of flow. So far, it has not yet been demonstrated that the vagus nerve plays a causal role in flow. To explore this we used transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), a novel non-invasive brain stimulation technique that increases activation of the locus coeruleus (LC) and norepinephrine release. A sham/placebo-controlled, randomized cross-over within-subject design was employed to infer a causal relation between the stimulated vagus nerve and flow as measured using the Flow Short-Scale in 32 healthy young volunteers. In both sessions, while being stimulated, participants had to rate their flow experience after having performed a task for 30 min. Active tVNS, compared to sham stimulation, decreased flow (as indexed by absorption scores). The results can be explained by the network reset theory, which assumes that high-phasic LC activity promotes a global reset of attention over exploitation of the current focus of attention, allowing rapid behavioral adaptation and resulting in decreased absorption scores. Furthermore, our findings corroborate the hypothesis that the vagus nerve and noradrenergic system are causally involved in flow.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colzato et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=32). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) vs. Sham stimulation was evaluated on Absorption score on the Flow Short-Scale (p=<0.05). Active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation significantly decreased flow experience, as indexed by absorption scores, compared to sham stimulation in healthy young adults.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: