Key result
Elevated neck circumference performs no better than waist circumference in identifying elevated C-IMT.
Why the study?
Neck circumference has been proposed as a new anthropometric index for assessing upper body fat related to CVD, but its role in identifying subclinical atherosclerosis needed exploration.
Does neck circumference identify subclinical atherosclerosis as effectively as waist circumference in a community-based population?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,387)
Does neck circumference identify subclinical atherosclerosis as effectively as waist circumference in a community-based population?
p-value: p=0.218 (men), 0.920 (women)
Neck circumference is a useful anthropometric index, comparable to waist circumference, for identifying subclinical atherosclerosis in a community population.
Neck circumference may serve as alternative to waist circumference for elevated C-IMT detection; leaves open its role in cardiovascular risk stratification.
AIMS: Recently, neck circumference (NC) has been proposed as a new anthropometric index for assessing upper body fat, which has a close relationship with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and their risk factors. The purpose of this study was to explore the role of NC in identifying subclinical atherosclerosis, an early stage of CVD, in a Shanghai community population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 1387 subjects (486 men and 901 women) from the Shanghai community. Anthropometric measurements, including NC and waist circumference (WC), were taken for all subjects. Carotid intima media thickness (C-IMT) was determined by carotid ultrasonography. Elevated NC was defined as NC ≥ 38.5 cm in men and NC ≥ 34.5 cm in women. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between NC and C-IMT, and this association remained significant even after adjustment for BMI (P = .015; P = .038). After adjusting for confounding factors, the additional risks of elevated C-IMT were 58% and 33% for each SD increase in NC in men and women, respectively (P = .003; P = .009). The NC cutoffs could identify 53.38% of men and 43.07% of women with elevated C-IMT, which was comparable to the identification of 56.08% of men and 42.57% of women with elevated C-IMT using WC cutoffs (P = .218; P = .920). CONCLUSIONS: NC was significantly and positively correlated with C-IMT. The cutoffs of NC could be helpful to identifying subclinical atherosclerosis in a community-based population, and the identification showed no difference compared to that using WC cutoffs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical atherosclerosis (n=1,387). Elevated neck circumference vs. Waist circumference was evaluated on Identification of elevated carotid intima media thickness (C-IMT) (p=0.218 (men), 0.920 (women)). Elevated neck circumference identified 53.4% of men and 43.1% of women with elevated C-IMT, showing no significant difference compared to waist circumference cutoffs (P=0.218 and P=0.920).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: