ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVCommunicationA Pyropheophorbide Dimer with Single Pyrrole π Overlap and a Low-Energy Q AbsorptionSpencer Knapp, Buwen Huang, Thomas J. Emge, Suzie Sheng, Karsten Krogh-Jespersen, Joseph A. Potenza, and Harvey J. SchugarView Author Information Department of Chemistry RutgersThe State University of New Jersey New Brunswick, New Jersey 08854-8087 Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 34, 7977–7978Publication Date (Web):August 17, 1999Publication History Received17 May 1999Published online17 August 1999Published inissue 1 September 1999https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja991632shttps://doi.org/10.1021/ja991632srapid-communicationACS PublicationsCopyright © 1999 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views271Altmetric-Citations15LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-AlertscloseSupporting Info (2)»Supporting Information Supporting Information SUBJECTS:Absorption,Chemical structure,Monomers,Oligomers,Pyrroles Get e-Alerts
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knapp et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: