Key result
The Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) score was an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.882 for each one-point increment.
Why the study?
Does the Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) accurately diagnose DIC and predict mortality in critically ill patients compared to established scoring systems?
Observational (n=753)
Yes
Does the Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) accurately diagnose DIC and predict mortality in critically ill patients compared to established scoring systems?
Odds Ratio: 1.882 (95% CI 1.699–2.083)
p-value: p=<0.001
The newly proposed Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) provides high diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill patients.
CDSS may aid DIC diagnosis and mortality prediction in critically ill patients; supports external validation against ISTH/JAAM before wider adoption.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common life-threatening complication in critically ill patients. The diagnostic scoring systems of DIC enable a more prompt and accurate diagnosis of DIC, such as the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW). This study prospectively evaluated the newly proposed Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS), which was conducted at 18 centers in China during a one-year period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that, for diagnosis of DIC and for prediction of the 28-day all-cause mortality, the CDSS had larger areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) than the ISTH and the JAAM in different groups. The CDSS also had larger AUC than the JMHW for the ISTH DIC in non-infectious diseases. All of the AUCs of the CDSS were greater than 0.8, accompanied with both high sensitivity and high specificity. Furthermore, the CDSS score was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.882; p < 0.001), and could reflect the illness severity (p < 0.001 for Spearman's rank correlations with the scores of severity). In conclusion, the CDSS is worthy of promotion with a better diagnostic and prognostic value for DIC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in critically ill patients (n=753). Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) vs. JMHW, ISTH, and JAAM criteria was evaluated on 28-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.882, 95% CI 1.699-2.083, p=<0.001). The Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) score was an independent predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.882 for each one-point increment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: