Key result
Dynamic functional connectivity during social threat correlates with stress emotions, identifying distinct positive and negative networks.
Cross-Sectional (n=16)
Individual differences in stress-induced positive and negative emotions are uniquely associated with large-scale brain networks, suggesting dynamic functional connectivity generates individual differences in emotional stress responses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
dFC networks link to distinct positive/negative stress emotions in small sample; hypothesis-generating, should not yet change practice.
Exposure to acute stress induces multiple emotional responses, each with their own unique temporal dynamics. Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) measures the temporal variability of network synchrony and captures individual differences in network neurodynamics. This study investigated the relationship between dFC and individual differences in emotions induced by an acute psychosocial stressor. Sixteen healthy adult women underwent fMRI scanning during a social evaluative threat (SET) task, and retrospectively completed questionnaires that assessed individual differences in subjectively experienced positive and negative emotions about stress and stress relief during the task. Group dFC was decomposed with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) into 10 components, each with a temporal signature, spatial network of functionally connected regions, and vector of participant loadings that captures individual differences in dFC. Participant loadings of two networks were positively correlated with stress-related emotions, indicating the existence of networks for positive and negative emotions. The emotion-related networks involved the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and amygdala, among other distributed brain regions, and time signatures for these emotion-related networks were uncorrelated. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in stress-induced positive and negative emotions are each uniquely associated with large-scale brain networks, and suggest that dFC is a mechanism that generates individual differences in the emotional components of the stress response. Hum Brain Mapp 38:6185-6205, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=16). Acute psychosocial stressor (social evaluative threat task) was evaluated on Correlation between dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) and individual differences in stress-induced emotions. Dynamic functional connectivity during a social evaluative threat task was positively correlated with stress-related emotions, identifying distinct networks for positive and negative emotions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: