Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Patients who rarely consult a GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis have more advanced cancer at diagnosis and a worse prognosis. To ensure more timely diagnosis of cancer, the GP should suspect cancer as early as possible. AIM: To investigate the GP's suspicion of cancer according to the patient with cancer's usual consultation pattern in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study based on survey data from general practice of 3985 Danish patients diagnosed with cancer from May 2010 to August 2010, and linked to national register data. METHOD: Using logistic regression analysis with restricted cubic splines, the odds ratio (OR) of the GP to suspect cancer as a function of the patient's number of face-to-face consultations with the GP in the 19-36 months before a cancer diagnosis was estimated. GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in patients aged <55 years in both rare and frequent attenders compared with average attenders. CONCLUSION: GPs suspect cancer more often in rare attenders ≥55 years. GPs' cancer suspicion was lower in younger patients (<55 years), in both rare and frequent attenders. GPs should be aware of possible missed opportunities for cancer diagnosis in young attenders and use safety netting to reduce the risk of missing a cancer diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: