Daily home hemodialysis (DHHD) requires simple, vascular access to minimize patients' discomfort but also to guarantee tolerance and long-term efficiency. The arteriovenous fistula is not ideal for DHHD because of the double puncture required every day; in addition, the rate of dysfunction is probably greater because of the more frequent use. Central venous catheters may be a good alternative to the arteriovenous fistula as long-term vascular access for DHHD. In this study we report our experience with the internal jugular vein two-catheter access for long-term dialysis and evaluate its possible use for DHHD. Since 1988, Tesio's twin catheters have been positioned in 908 patients with exhausted peripheral vascular bed. In all patients hemodialysis could be performed a few minutes after the surgical procedure. The survival rate of catheters, in a selected group of 46 patients, at 1, 2, and 5 years was, respectively, 92%, 87%, and 82%. The mean blood flow was 282±29 mL/min at 1 month, 286±36 mL/min at 1 year, and 274±37 mL/min at 5 years. Venous pressure in the inlet side was 102±31 mm Hg at 1 month, 126±36 mm Hg at 1 year, and 132±58 mm Hg at 5 years. Catheter clotting was treated either with thrombolytic agents or with catheter (one or both) replacement. Sepsis was treated with systemic antibiotic therapy or catheter removal. Data support the potential role of the internal jugular vein two-catheter system for DHHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tesio et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: