BACKGROUND: Tissue-based immunohistochemistry (IHC) for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) remains the clinical standard for guiding immunotherapy selection in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but is constrained by intratumoral spatial heterogeneity and procedural sampling risks. Circulating soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) generated either through alternative mRNA splicing or by ADAM10/17-mediated proteolytic shedding offer minimally invasive liquid-biopsy alternatives that capture systemic immune dynamics in real time. METHODS: This review synthesizes clinical and translational data from prospective validation cohorts, surgical trials, and multi-center meta-analyses to evaluate the stage-stratified diagnostic utility, prognostic reliability, and treatment-response predictive value of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 across diverse therapeutic contexts. RESULTS: Cross-sectional baseline assessments show modest standalone diagnostic sensitivity due to significant absolute concentration overlaps between oncological cohorts and healthy controls. However, elevated pre-treatment sPD-L1 functions as a robust independent negative prognostic indicator of overall survival (OS) and a predictor of primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) across advanced stages, while demonstrating no prognostic relevance under conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Longitudinally, an acute postoperative sPD-L1 increase of ≥20% at four months marks micro-metastatic persistence and predicts disease recurrence in early-stage surgical cohorts (Odds Ratio = 10.29). Conversely, sPD-1 demonstrates distinct stage-specific volatility; pre-treatment profiles lack stable prognostic indicators, but an early on-treatment plasma surge during anti-PD-1 monotherapy independently maps to prolonged progression-free survival and superior OS (Hazard Ratio = 0.24). Finally, composite liquid biosignatures (e.g., sCombo or joint bsPD-L1/MMP screening) significantly optimize predictive resolution over single-analyte measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating sPD-L1 serves as a reliable negative indicator of therapeutic efficacy and surgical durability, whereas on-treatment tracking of sPD-1 captures protective host T-cell clonal reactivation. Cross-platform assay standardization and predefined cutoff validation remain essential thresholds before these liquid biomarkers can be implemented into standard clinical practice and thoracic surgery. Integrating these circulating checkpoints into high-throughput multi-omics platforms and AI-based analytics is a promising next step toward reproducible predictive signatures that could guide personalized treatment in thoracic oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vachlas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: