Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical review demonstrates varied utility of eosinophilia for directing steroid therapy across obstructive airway diseases, highlighting the risk of overtreatment in non-asthma conditions.
A BSTRACT Eosinophilic airway inflammation has emerged as an important biomarker in obstructive airway diseases and is increasingly used to guide inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy. In asthma, eosinophilia is a well-established hallmark of type 2 inflammation and predicts favorable responsiveness to corticosteroids. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), blood eosinophil count has become a practical biomarker for identifying patients likely to benefit from ICS-containing regimens, particularly among those with frequent exacerbations. However, the interpretation of eosinophilia in bronchiectasis remains controversial, with limited evidence supporting routine ICS use, except in selected eosinophilic phenotypes or coexisting asthma. This viewpoint examines whether eosinophilia should automatically imply ICS therapy across obstructive airway diseases. We review the biological rationale, current evidence, limitations of eosinophils as biomarkers, disease-specific recommendations, and the balance between therapeutic benefits and adverse effects of ICS. While eosinophilia is a useful treatable trait, indiscriminate extrapolation of asthma paradigms to COPD and bronchiectasis may lead to overtreatment and increased risk of pneumonia, fungal infection, and microbiological colonization. Precision medicine approaches that integrate eosinophil counts with clinical phenotype, exacerbation history, and radiological findings are likely to optimize outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deependra Kumar Rai (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: