Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective matched cohort study finds lower intravenous steroid risk with tirzepatide versus GLP-1 receptor agonists in inflammatory bowel disease, indicating dual incretin agonism benefits.
Background/Aims: Evidence suggests glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) may improve disease-specific outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, may offer additional benefits. We compared clinical and safety outcomes among patients with IBD treated with tirzepatide versus GLP-1RAs. Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with IBD were identified within a retrospective multiinstitutional U.S. database who were prescribed tirzepatide or GLP-1RA between May 2022 and January 2025. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed for demographics, comorbidities, and IBD medications. Outcomes were assessed over 18 months and included intravenous (IV) steroid use, intestinal surgery, emergency department visits, hospitalization, and a composite of IV steroids and surgery. Adverse outcomes were assessed. Results: After matching, 3,042 patients (mean age, 54.6 years; 71.3% female) were analyzed in each cohort. Median follow-up was 540 days (interquartile range, 478-540 days) for tirzepatide versus 540 days (interquartile range, 540-540 days) for GLP-1RA. Patients taking tirzepatide had a significantly reduced risk of IV steroid use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.94) and composite IBD outcomes (aHR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.73-0.97) with similar risk of hospitalization, emergency department visit and receipt of intestinal surgery. In patients with ulcerative colitis specifically, tirzepatide was similarly associated with a reduced risk of IV steroid use (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97). Adverse outcome risks were similar. Conclusions: Patients with IBD prescribed tirzepatide may have lower risk of IV steroid use compared to those taking GLP-1RAs. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these results and explore underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: