Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The dissolution of (Al, Cr) 2 O 3 into CaO—MgO—Al 2 O 3 —SiO 2 melts, under static and forced‐convective conditions was investigated at 1550°C in air. With sufficient MgO in the melt, or sufficient Cr 2 O 3 in (Al, Cr) 2 O 3 , a layer consisting of a spinel solid solution, Mg(Al, Cr) 2 O 4 , formed at the (Al, Cr) 2 O 3 /melt interface. The dissolution kinetics of 1.5 and 10 wt% Cr 2 O 3 specimens were determined as a function of immersion time, specimen rotation rate, and magnesia content of the melt. Electron microprobe analysis was used to characterize concentration gradients in the (Al, Cr) 2 O 3 sample, the Mg(Al, Cr) 2 O 4 spinel, or in the melt after immersion of specimens containing 1.5 to 78 mol% Cr 2 O 3 . The dissolution kinetics and microprobe analyses indicated that a steady‐state condition was reached during forced‐convective, indirect (Al, Cr) 2 O 3 dissolution such that spinel layer formation was rate limited by solid‐state diffusion through the spinel layer and/or through the specimen, and spinel layer dissolution was rate limited by liquid‐phase diffusion through a boundary layer in the melt. This is consistent with a model previously developed for the indirect dissolution of sapphire in CMAS melts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandhage et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: