This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
NiFe 2 O 4 nanocrystals were dispersed in silica by a sol−gel route. The dried gel was amorphous, in which isolated Fe 3+ ions had a weak interaction with silica matrix, as characterized by a weak IR absorption at ca. 580 cm -1 . Heat treatment at 400 °C resulted in nickel ferrite clusters being partially formed, and these clusters were observed to interact with the matrix through Si−O−Fe bonds. This interaction reached its maximum with the complete formation of NiFe 2 O 4 clusters as the temperature was raised to 600 °C. Above this temperature, NiFe 2 O 4 clusters grew larger into nanocrystals, while the interaction between the nanocrystals and silica matrix disappeared with breakage of Si−O−Fe bonds. The grain growth for magnetic nanoparticles was accompanied with rearrangement of amorphous silica network. The preference of forming NiFe 2 O 4 nanocrystals eliminated the possibility of precipitation of crystallite component oxides, e.g., NiO, γ-Fe 2 O 3, or Fe 3 O 4 in amorphous silica matrix, or crystalline silica, e.g., cristobalite or quartz, even when the treatment temperature was 1100 °C. Fe ions in silica glasses were determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy to be present exclusively as Fe 3+ ions in a high-spin state at octahedral coordination, and the chemical environment of the Fe 3+ ions seemed to remain unchanged until the nickel ferrite clusters crystallized. The formation mechanism for NiFe 2 O 4 nanocrystals can be explained in terms of Ni 2+ ions shifting from the tetrahedral centers to undistorted octahedral sites in the spinel lattice and the partial transformation of FeO 6 octahedron to FeO 4 tetrahedron. The critical dimension for the NiFe 2 O 4 nanocrystals in silica was detected as ca. 9 nm. Below the critical size, NiFe 2 O 4 nanocrystals had a superparamagnetic single-domain structure, while the nanocrystals with particle sizes larger than the critical size exhibited bulklike behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: