Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors investigate the benefits for the precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution technique of using the GPS L1, L2 and L5; Galileo E1, E5a, E5b and E6; and BeiDou B1, B2 and B3 measurements. Data from 17 reference stations over a period of 31 consecutive days in 2018 were used. It was found that the four-frequency Galileo combination of E1+E5a+E5b+E6 provides the lowest geometric and ambiguity variance. In a kinematic test using triple- and four-frequency GNSS measurements, the solution convergence time can be shortened by an average of 5 minutes as compared to the triple-frequency GPS-only PPP case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duong et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: