Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study reports high clinical response for percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk acute cholecystitis, indicating an effective alternative to emergency surgery.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used in managing acute cholecystitis in the setting of a patient with severe comorbidities where emergency cholecystectomy would carry significant mortality. The present study aims to assess the role, efficacy and complications of PC in acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Retrospective review of case notes of patients who underwent PC at Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Australia between July 1997 and December 2002. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age 75 years; range 50-96) underwent PC. Indications for PC were significant comorbidities (n = 6), failure of conservative treatment (n = 4), bile duct malignancy (n = 2), sepsis of unknown origin (n = 2), patient declined surgery (n = 1) and local perforation (n = 1). Technical success rate was 94%. Clinical response to PC was observed in 15 patients. Overall mortality was 18% (3/16) with one death caused by PC failure. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in seven patients (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a useful alternative means of treating non-resolving acute cholecystitis in circumstances where emergency surgery is hazardous. It also offers effective palliation in patients not suitable for subsequent surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teoh et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: