Orientation: Staff well-being in distance-learning universities is shaped by leadership practices, institutional communication and the broader organisational environment. Research purpose: This study explored how academic and professional staff at a distance-learning university perceive and experience organisational support, and how these perceptions relate to their well-being at work. Motivation for the study: Although well-being initiatives in higher education often prioritise individual coping and self-care, limited empirical attention has been given to how organisational conditions within South African distance-learning institutions influence staff well-being. Research approach/design and method: A qualitative research design was employed, using open-ended survey responses from 840 academic and professional staff members at a large South African distance-learning university. Data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis, informed by psychosocial safety climate and perceived organisational support frameworks. Main findings: Three interconnected themes emerged: increasing work demands linked to workload governance, variation in opportunities for staff voice and line management support, and differing views on organisational responsibility for well-being. Everyday leadership and human resource practices, particularly those related to workload management, communication and recognition, played a central role in shaping staff experiences of support and well-being. Practical/managerial implications: Enhancing staff well-being in distance-learning contexts requires transparent communication, meaningful recognition and leadership practices that foster psychological safety across organisational levels. Contribution/value-add: This study highlights organisational support and everyday leadership behaviours (e.g. communication and feedback) as key influences on staff well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nisha Harry (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: