This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background Faba bean cultivation in northern Europe is challenged by high variability in yield performance due to strong genotype × environment interaction (GEI). Appropriate GEI modeling and interpretation is essential for both cultivar recommendation and breeding for Nordic conditions. Methods Grain yield data from fifteen spring faba bean cultivars evaluated in eleven Norwegian environments during four growing seasons (2022–2025) were analyzed using the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) model. Climatic drivers of GEI were investigated using factorial regression, while genome-wide SNP markers were used to assess the relationship between molecular diversity and adaptive differentiation. Results Environment, genotype, and GEI significantly influenced grain yield. The AMMI model with three GEI principal components (AMMI3) represented the biologically meaningful GEI signal and explained 83.4% of the GEI variation. The predictive accuracy of this model closely approached that of BLUP and GBLUP. Factorial regression showed that maximum and mean September temperatures explained 38.5% of the GEI variation, indicating that late-season thermal conditions are the principal environmental drivers of cultivar adaptation. We identified three top-yielding genotypes (Ketu, Birgit, and Vire) that can be object of site-specific recommendation. Two sub-regions emerged as possibly distinct breeding targets, namely, a major one, and a smaller one featuring cooler late-cycle temperatures and specific adaptation of very early material. A significant Mantel correlation between genomic and adaptive dissimilarity (r = 0.40, P = 0.029) suggested that differences in environmental adaptation have a measurable genetic basis. Conclusions This study identified elite cultivars for recommendation and generated crucial information for future crop breeding and variety testing in Norway. Breeding for wide adaptation across climatically diversified environments is justified by the modest size of the smaller sub-region and its expected decreasing importance due to climate change. The relationship between genomic and adaptive dissimilarity, if confirmed for a larger genotype set, could be exploited for a preliminary screening of regional breeding material and novel plant introductions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanotto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: