Sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution is a typical cleaning agent for membrane fouling. However, it can damage membrane chemical structures and produce toxic disinfection byproducts, which in turn reduces the membrane performance. This study focuses on the fabrication of active membranes thereby overcoming the limitations of chemical cleaning. A hierarchical active poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane with polydopamine/polyethyleneimine (PEI) co-supported iron nanoparticle (Fe NP) catalysts was successfully constructed and denoted as a Fe-HP-membrane. The Fe-HP-membrane exhibited excellent advanced oxidation activity with maximum flux recoveries (∼85% with bovine serum albumin [BSA] and ∼95% with humic acid [HA] solutions). After the static experiment of ∼30 days, the BSA proteins and HA successfully desorbed from the membrane surface. Especially, with a trace amount of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) flowing over the surface of the Fe-HP-membrane, highly exposed active sites were observed. Membrane cleaning showed that the “outside-to-in” active surfaces generated considerable amounts of • OH radicals at the interface of BSA or HA and the fouled membrane. As a result, the unwanted foulants were successfully removed from the membrane interface, enabling multiple use of the Fe-HP-membrane. Therefore, backwashing with a small amount of H 2 O 2 (0.33 wt %) covered ∼20% of the flux. In contrary, backwashing with NaClO (1 wt %) can only achieve a flux recovery of ∼10% after six consecutive BSA filtration cycles. The Fe-HP-membrane exhibited better HA foulant removal (a flux recovery of ∼51%) after backwashing with H 2 O 2 than using NaClO (a flux recovery of ∼43%). Our findings demonstrate a new platform for water treatment and regeneration of fouled membranes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: